Make a workflow decision before the pilot budget is committed.
For life-sciences workflows, the Sprint follows one process from intake to final review. It documents who does what, which tools and files are involved, where time is spent, and what happens when the output is wrong. Then it separates deterministic data handling from the steps where a model or a domain expert is the better tool. You leave with one bounded pilot and a decision on whether to build it.
Three calendar weeks after kickoff and receipt of the agreed source material
Who it is for
Life-sciences, biotech, and animal-nutrition teams with a recurring workflow, representative inputs, and a decision-maker who can evaluate a pilot.
General AI training, vendor shopping by itself, wet-lab execution, or any work where a regulated judgment would be delegated to a model.
What you get
- A current-state workflow map
- A time and cost baseline for the workflow, or a written note on what it would take to get one
- A record of the handoffs, review points, and failure consequences
- A breakdown of deterministic, model-assisted, and human-judgment steps
- A risk-and-value ranking of the possible automation points
- One bounded pilot specification with inputs, outputs, acceptance criteria, and stop conditions
- An implementation estimate for that pilot
- A build, narrow, defer, or stop decision memo
Proof and related reading
See if this fits your bioprocess or formulation workflow.
Bring one workflow where data quality, provenance, or handoff friction slows the team. I will read what you send and reply with a straight answer on whether a three-week Sprint is the right first step.
Book a scoping call Read the full offer details →