Scope one workflow before you fund the build.
The Sprint follows one recurring technical workflow from intake to final review. We document who does what, which tools and files are involved, where time is spent, and what happens when the output is wrong. Then we separate the deterministic steps from the steps where a model or a person is the better tool. You leave with one bounded pilot and a decision on whether to build it.
Three calendar weeks after kickoff and receipt of the agreed source material
Who it is for
Science and engineering teams with a recurring workflow, representative inputs, an internal sponsor, and a real decision about whether automation is worth funding.
General AI training, vendor shopping by itself, open-ended staff augmentation, broad transformation strategy, or autonomous high-stakes decisions.
What you get
- A current-state workflow map
- A time and cost baseline for the workflow, or a written note on what it would take to get one
- A record of the handoffs, review points, and failure consequences
- A breakdown of deterministic, model-assisted, and human-judgment steps
- A risk-and-value ranking of the possible automation points
- One bounded pilot specification with inputs, outputs, acceptance criteria, and stop conditions
- An implementation estimate for that pilot
- A build, narrow, defer, or stop decision memo
Proof and related reading
See if this fits your workflow.
Tell me which workflow is slow or fragile. I will read what you send and reply with a straight answer on whether a three-week Sprint is the right first step.
Book a scoping call Read the full offer details →